His name had a second coming. Scientists say that the name of Christianity’s central figure wasn’t originally Jesus Christ — ...

This evolution of Jesus's name is not the only historical curiosity. For instance, Jesus Christ was not born on December 25 ...

T he question of whether Jesus of Nazareth truly existed as a historical figure has intrigued believers and skeptics alike. While the theological claims about his divinity are a matter of faith ...

It is undoubtedly one of the most famous names in human history, but now the question is being asked whether the name "Jesus ...

Historical accounts by non-Christian authors also reinforce the idea that Jesus was a real historical figure. The Roman historian Tacitus, in his "Annals" written in the year 116 CE, mentions ...

The most obvious reason that Jesus' name wouldn't have sounded like the English version of 'Jesus' is that he wouldn't have ...

The quest for the historical Jesus has gone on for about three centuries. Now, the classical study of this was done by Albert Schweitzer, at the turn to the 20th century, in his book, "The Quest ...

Despite being one of the most famous names on Earth, historians and linguists suggest that “Jesus Christ” was not the ...

the central figure of Christianity, was not actually called "Jesus." Historical and linguistic evidence suggests that the Son of God would have gone by a different name entirely, one rooted in the ...