Referees wish for only the most solid science to be published ... with the expectation in the popular press that peer review is a process by which fraudulent data is detected before publication ...

The process of assessing manuscripts is crucial in making sure that the scientific record is accurate, trustworthy and of high quality. It’s an integral part of getting great science into the world.

Peer review is the foundation of quality in research for both books and journals, ensuring that published research is rigorous and ethical. Peer reviewers can access a number of resources to assist ...

for funded projects, the independent scientific peer review process by the funder is the usual route ... you will need to provide a copy of the Health Science peer review template for review. If your ...

Why does inclusion and diversity in peer review matter? A peer review process that is inclusive can promote quality and fairness. If we encourage debate and discussion from a diverse range of voices, ...

Peer review is a central feature of academic work. It’s the process through which research ... for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science, and a non-profit metaresearch accelerator ...

That was when major journal database Web of Science delisted well-known life ... first and not published if they do not pass the peer-review process. Now, eLife’s upheaval of the publishing ...

science societies and academies could cooperate for a novel way to evaluate scientific work. Currently, publishing houses coordinate three aspects of the publication process: peer-review ...

but how will this affect researchers as future applications of AI-powered algorithms impact each stage of the review and publishing process? Join Sonja Krane of ACS Publications and Osvaldo Oliviera ...