Diamond v. Chakrabarty: Patent protection is available for a micro-organism that is artificially constructed rather than naturally occurring.

Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether living organisms can be patented.

Chakrabarty (Plaintiff) sought to patent a live, man-made microorganism. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A live, man-made microorganism is a non-naturally occurring composition and therefore may be patented. Facts.

Respondent filed a patent application relating to his invention of a human-made, genetically engineered bacterium capable of breaking down crude oil, a property which is possessed by no naturally occurring bacteria.

After genetically engineering a bacterium capable of breaking down crude oil, Ananda Chakrabarty sought to patent his creation under Title 35 U.S.C. Section 101, providing patents for people who invent or discover "any" new and useful "manufacture" or "composition of matter."

In Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980), the scope of Section 101 was challenged as applied to the new fields of biotechnology and genetic engineering, with respect to the patent eligibility of a new bacterial "life form."

On 17 March 1980, the United States Supreme Court (hereinafter "the Court”) confirmed the decision of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to grant a patent for a bacterium capable of breaking down crude oil (Pseudomonas putida).

Get Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

2024年5月2日 · The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Chakrabarty, determining that his creation fell within the scope of patentable subject matter as defined by Congress. The decision was grounded in an interpretation of statutory language and legislative intent, with an emphasis on supporting human ingenuity.

In 1972, respondent Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, filed a patent application, assigned to the General Electric Co. The application asserted 36 claims related to Chakrabarty's in-vention of "a bacterium from the genus Pseudomonas con-taining therein at …