1900- 1904 Army Leggings - US MILITARIA FORUM
2009年4月27日 · Here are a pair of leggings made by Rosenwasser Bros which I believe are 1916-1917 vintage ( date is unreadable) but a few things about it puzzle me. First is the height which is 16 inches. The leggings are marked size 4, but I compared the leggings to others from 1916-1918 including a size 5 pair. Those are 3 inches shorter.
Navy Leggings - NAVAL & SEA SERVICE UNIFORMS - U.S. Militaria …
2007年7月21日 · Some recruits received Marine style leggings, and some received Army style. Obviousley, when the Army went to boots, there were plenty of leggings in the stock system, so they were easy to get and issue. The leggings were to be worn if assigned to a landing party, or shore patrol (the white gear did now become Navy standard until the 1960s.)
WW2 U.S. leggings/gaiters - UNIFORMS - U.S. Militaria Forum
2008年1月8日 · Below there is issuing the leggings at Fort Belvoir in 1942. Bob Hudson Posted January 9, 2008. Bob Hudson.
Leggings Sizes - UNIFORMS - U.S. Militaria Forum
2010年12月31日 · I think this drawing was done by Shelby Stanton. It does show the leggings. The leggings are also mentioned in the book SOG Volume IV by Harve Saal. The leggings were to help against leeches. The USN was still using leggings during the VN era. I have one pair of leggings in new condition that are made in OD3 but have a (IIRC) 1962 date on them.
are these tan canvas leggings WW1 era? or later?
2007年12月29日 · USN/USMC leggings are mostly recognized by the eyelet sequence. One eyelet for every hook, since the lace spirals around inside and out of the edge of the side panel. Whereas the army style forms loops on the outside only for every hook. USN/USMC leggings were mostly khaki or mustard until 1944 when they started making them in OD #3 also.
US Army Uniforms, 1908 - UNIFORMS - U.S. Militaria Forum
2009年5月31日 · Leggings of the short, front laced 1904 pattern on the left and pre 1904 leggings on the right.
Leggings, USMC, and US Army? - US MILITARIA FORUM
2012年7月8日 · Here is a pair of Navy Leggings made in 1943, but in the Army's M1938 configuration with 9 eyelets. The Navy Leggings are normally identical to the Marines'. All that said, Garandy, I wouldn't write those Leggings off just yet.
FIELD & PERSONAL GEAR SECTION - U.S. Militaria Forum
2010年4月10日 · The Pre-WW2 leggings I've seen have USMC depot stamps on the inside of them. The earliest I've seen a pair with this stamp is the early 1930's. As far as USMC leggings from the WW1 era go, I have not seen a pair with USMC markings that I …
WW I Military Home Guard - US MILITARIA FORUM
2019年5月25日 · MP25, I always thought that it was okay for State and Home Guard units to wear federal buttons on the military uniforms that they were authorized to wear. My understanding has always been that they were not authorized to wear military rank chevrons or military branch of service insignia.
2nd Rangers and Corcorans - MILITARY HISTORY DISCUSSIONS
2016年7月25日 · However, they sure started wearing them in combat directly after D-Day. Film and photos support that. The 5th Bn wore a mix between the two and it's about 50/50 jump boots and reverse uppers with cut down leggings for D-Day. Like the 2nd following June 6th, they started to wear corcorans almost exclusively.