RG8X v.s. RG58U Cable? | RadioReference.com Forums
2006年1月10日 · He was referencing RG-8X (mini foam). This is a smaller version of RG-8, but still has a little bit less loss than rg-58. dsmall, If you are doing a mobile install, your better bet would be the mini foam, but at these lengths (maybe 10-15') it will certainly not make a very noticeable difference.
Difference between RG58/U and RG58C/U - RadioReference.com …
2010年3月28日 · In the Belden catalog, RG-58/U has a solid center conductor while RG-58C/U has a stranded center conductor. The solid center conductor type will have less loss at 400 MHz, but both are pretty bad. I would not use either one for a cable more than about 20 feet long.
RG-58 VS GR-58u - RadioReference.com Forums
2021年2月21日 · Assuming you mean RG58 vs RG58U, the answer is that RG58 has a solid center conductor, and RG58U has a stranded center conductor. 58 for permanent installs where the cable won't be subjected to repeated flexing, and 58U for installs that need more flexibility, tighter bend radius, etc. such as mobiles or temporary connections.
Did I mess up by buying RG174 antenna cable instead of RG8 or …
2023年12月31日 · 10 feet of RG-58 on 154MHz will result in 11% of the signal lost in the cable. 10 feet of RG-174 on 154MHz will result in 22% of the signal lost in the cable. Losses go up with frequency: 10 feet of RG-8 on 460MHz will result in 10% of the signal lost in the cable. 10 feet of RG-58 on 460MHz will result in 19% of the signal lost in the cable.
RG-58 vs. RG-6 - RadioReference.com Forums
2007年8月13日 · RG-6 has much less loss than RG-58, and less loss than even RG-8. I would never use RG-58 for a base scanner installation unless the total run was less than ten feet or so. trooperdude
Coax RG 58 U Versus RG 58 AU - RadioReference.com Forums
2012年6月1日 · RG-58/U and RG-58A/U are the same cable, the only difference is in the centre conductor. RG-58/U has a solid core and RG-58 A/U has a stranded core. BNC connectors should never be installed on RG-58 A/U as a single strand of wire from that centre conductor will cause a change of impedance or dead short in your coax resulting in attenuation of ...
Low Loss Vs RS RG-58 - RadioReference.com Forums
2011年7月19日 · Based on this (Welcome to Times Microwave | Coaxial Cable - Attenuation & Power Handling Calculator) RG-58 will give you 11.3 dB of loss over your 78 feet (numbers based on a 900 MHz signal, good round # for 800 MHz band receiption) while RG-8X will give you 9.5 dB of loss (went from really bad to just pretty bad).
Make an antenna with RG-58 for a Repeater
2011年7月30日 · 50' of RG-58 will get you 4.833 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 16.431 effective watts at the antenna. 100' of RG-58 will get you 9.666 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 5.4 effective watts at the antenna.
RG-58 type cable: LMR-200 vs. LMR-195 - RadioReference.com …
2008年6月25日 · This is something that is insignificant for solder and crimp type PL-259 connectors, however the larger center conductor (LMR-200 is .044", LMR-195 is .037") makes it difficult to attach the center pins for RG-58 type SMA connectors. Specifically, this means the gold plated crimp/solder type sold at RS (With a teflon dielectric, amazingly enough!
VHF/UHF RG-58/RG-6 - RadioReference.com Forums
2014年5月1日 · RG6 for low or medium power transmit is not a big deal, the match will be a little worse as mentioned and the loss is a little less than RG-58. Most mobile antennas come with about 18ft of coax so buying 1000ft of RG-58 anticipating installs for others doesn't sound very cost effective. prcguy