![](/rp/kFAqShRrnkQMbH6NYLBYoJ3lq9s.png)
Tennessee v. Lane | Oyez
2004年1月13日 · Lane, Jones, and several others sued Tennessee in federal district court, alleging that by denying them public services based on their disabilities, Tennessee was in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990).
Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004) - Justia US Supreme Court …
2003年6月23日 · In August 1998, respondents George Lane and Beverly Jones filed this action against the State of Tennessee and a number of Tennessee counties, alleging past and ongoing violations of Title II. Respondents, both of whom are paraplegics who use wheelchairs for mobility, claimed that they were denied access to, and the services of, the state court ...
Tennessee v. Lane - Wikipedia
Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004), was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States involving Congress's enforcement powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [1] The plaintiffs were disabled Tennesseans who could not access the upper floors in state courthouses.
Tennessee v. Lane | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs
Tennessee (D) argued that the law was unconstitutional. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Title II of the ADA which prohibits discrimination against disabled persons by public entities is constitutional.
Tennessee v. Lane - fedsoc.org
Lane, Jones, and several others sued Tennessee in federal district court, alleging that by denying them public services based on their disabilities, Tennessee was in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990).
TENNESSEE V. LANE - LII / Legal Information Institute
2004年5月17日 · In August 1998, respondents George Lane and Beverly Jones filed this action against the State of Tennessee and a number of Tennessee counties, alleging past and ongoing violations of Title II. Respondents, both of whom are paraplegics who use wheelchairs for mobility, claimed that they were denied access to, and the services of, the state court ...
TENNESSEE v. LANE et al. - LII / Legal Information Institute
Respondent paraplegics filed this action for damages and equitable relief, alleging that Tennessee and a number of its counties had denied them physical access to that State’s courts in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which provides: “ [N]o qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of suc...
Tennessee v. Lane - DRCNH
2004年5月17日 · WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court upheld the rights of disabled people under a national law meant to protect them, ruling Monday that a paraplegic who crawled up the steps of a small-town courthouse can sue over the lack of an elevator.
Tennessee v. Lane - law2.umkc.edu
In August 1998, respondents George Lane and Beverly Jones filed this action against the State of Tennessee and a number of Tennessee counties, alleging past and ongoing violations of Title II.
Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004): Case Brief Summary
George Lane (plaintiff) and Beverly Jones filed suit in federal district court against the state of Tennessee (defendant) alleging that the state violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 by denying them access to state courthouses due to their disabilities.